I have been studying climate change for a couple of decades. David Denham is correct. The Earth's climate has been changing profoundly ever since it had an atmosphere and liquid water. The change since 1850 is modest and unremarkable compared to the profound changes that have occurred in the past and will occur in the future.
The drivers of profound climate change are celestial in nature, and all the king's horses, and all the king's men, and all the king's treasure cannot change them.
Our greenhouse gases are not planet killers. In fact, the greenhouse gas effect is necessary for our existence on Earth, and it is self-limiting.
I have a nice presentation covering it all. If you would like a copy, contact me at dbdoll911@gmail.com.
Hi David, I appreciate your work. Are you able to add some references for what you are stating. References are always helpful when sharing this info with those that think differently and it makes your work more powerful to get them thinking. Olga
Hi Olga, thanks for your comment. I could include the graphs of the historical temperatures. They are everywhere. The CO2 volumes and quantities are from the IPCC or the CDIAC, and the Energy or Watts/m2 are straight off the NASA Energy Budget Diagram. The Physics and Thermodynamics are just basic science. To include all of that makes it a very bulky piece which I was hesitant to do , although it does help those who don't have all the knowledge. I guess I was aiming it at the Small "s" scientists who propagate the rubbish and should know better. This piece will end up in scientific circles like the GSL ( Geologists) and will generate comment, no doubt. But if I have the time to include all the references I will. I just want people to think and question. The lie has gone on long enough. Cheers David
Hi David and thank you for your reply. I find that a lot of those who disbelieve tend to call out for references. They don't seem to be eager to question and do some research, but rather want things to be served to them on the plate. What I observed is, if there are no references many will not consider to ponder on the information (treating it as false) or even read the article to the end. I want for your article to impact a wider group. The need to awake many more as quickly as possible is crucial. Thank you,
Hi Olga, all noted. I am going away for about a month,but I will look at rejigging my piece when I return. It won't be difficult to install the graphs and the NASA Budget diagram, but some things will have to be taken at face value. Things like a cooler object cannot heat a hotter one. etc. We can't assume the ideologues are that moronic, but who knows. Again thanks for your input . DD
I have been studying climate change for a couple of decades. David Denham is correct. The Earth's climate has been changing profoundly ever since it had an atmosphere and liquid water. The change since 1850 is modest and unremarkable compared to the profound changes that have occurred in the past and will occur in the future.
The drivers of profound climate change are celestial in nature, and all the king's horses, and all the king's men, and all the king's treasure cannot change them.
Our greenhouse gases are not planet killers. In fact, the greenhouse gas effect is necessary for our existence on Earth, and it is self-limiting.
I have a nice presentation covering it all. If you would like a copy, contact me at dbdoll911@gmail.com.
Hi David,
I would love a copy . I will email you.
Hi David, I appreciate your work. Are you able to add some references for what you are stating. References are always helpful when sharing this info with those that think differently and it makes your work more powerful to get them thinking. Olga
Hi Olga, thanks for your comment. I could include the graphs of the historical temperatures. They are everywhere. The CO2 volumes and quantities are from the IPCC or the CDIAC, and the Energy or Watts/m2 are straight off the NASA Energy Budget Diagram. The Physics and Thermodynamics are just basic science. To include all of that makes it a very bulky piece which I was hesitant to do , although it does help those who don't have all the knowledge. I guess I was aiming it at the Small "s" scientists who propagate the rubbish and should know better. This piece will end up in scientific circles like the GSL ( Geologists) and will generate comment, no doubt. But if I have the time to include all the references I will. I just want people to think and question. The lie has gone on long enough. Cheers David
Hi David and thank you for your reply. I find that a lot of those who disbelieve tend to call out for references. They don't seem to be eager to question and do some research, but rather want things to be served to them on the plate. What I observed is, if there are no references many will not consider to ponder on the information (treating it as false) or even read the article to the end. I want for your article to impact a wider group. The need to awake many more as quickly as possible is crucial. Thank you,
Olga
Hi Olga, all noted. I am going away for about a month,but I will look at rejigging my piece when I return. It won't be difficult to install the graphs and the NASA Budget diagram, but some things will have to be taken at face value. Things like a cooler object cannot heat a hotter one. etc. We can't assume the ideologues are that moronic, but who knows. Again thanks for your input . DD